Math Insight

Classifying equilibria of two-dimensional nonlinear systems

Math 2241, Spring 2016
Name:
ID #:
Due date: March 9, 2016, 11:59 p.m.
Table/group #:
Group members:
Total points: 3
  1. For a one-dimensional dynamical system, $\diff{x}{t}=f(x)$, the the stability of an equilibrium $x_e$ (where $f(x_e)=0$) depends on the
    of $f$ at that equilibrium. If $f'(x_e) > 0$, then the equilibrium $x_e$ is
    . If $f'(x_e) <0$, then the equilibrium $x_e$ is
    . How can you see that this is true?
    1. Stability is a local property. We only care about what is happening right around the equilibrium. To determine stability, we can zoom into the region right around the equilibrium.
    2. If you zoom in on a differentiable function, it begins to look indistinguishable from its
      . The function looks
      in this zoomed in view.
    3. The slope of the tangent line at the equilibrium $x=x_e$ is $m =$
      . (Online, enter $x_e$ as x_e.)
    4. In the zoomed in view, if we pretend the equilibrium is at zero, the differential equation looks like $\diff{x}{t}=mx$.
    5. We get exponential decay if
      ; hence, in terms of $f'(x_e)$, the equilibrium is stable if
      .
    6. We get exponential growth if
      ; hence, in terms of $f'(x_e)$, the equilibrium is unstable if
      .

    An equivalent approach works for a two-dimensional system of equations, say \begin{align*} \diff{x}{t} &= f(x,y)\\ \diff{y}{t} &= g(x,y), \end{align*} where $f$ and $g$ are some functions of $x$ and $y$. If $(x_e,y_e)$ is an equilibrium (where $f(x_e,y_e)=0 $ and $g(x_e,y_e)=0$), then we can zoom in around the equilibrium to determine the stability. As we zoom in, the same thing happens as did for one-dimensional systems: the system begins to look
    . This time, rather than looking like the linear equation $\diff{x}{t}=mx$ when zooming in, the zoomed-in system of differential equations will look like a linear system of the form \begin{align*} \diff{x}{t} &= \alpha x + \beta y\\ \diff{y}{t} &= \gamma x + \delta y \end{align*} or, in matrix form, as the equation $\diff{\vc{x} }{t} = A\vc{x}$, where $A=\begin{bmatrix}\alpha & \beta\\ \gamma & \delta \end{bmatrix}$. Here, $\alpha$, $\beta$, $\gamma$, and $\delta$ are just four numbers that play the role that the slope $m$ did for the one-dimensional case. We already studied this two-dimensional linear system and determined the condition for the equilibrium to be stable. If $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ are the eigenvalues of $A$, then the equilibrium $(0,0)$ of $\diff{\vc{x} }{t}= A\vc{x}$ is stable if
    . It turns out that this condition will carry over to the nonlinear system. The only question is: which matrix's eigenvalues are the relevant ones?

    In the one-dimensional case, the slope $m=f'(x_e)$ played the role of the matrix $A$ and its eigenvalue. The linear approximation (i.e., tangent line) was determined by the derivative of $f$ at the equilibrium. The same idea is true for the two-dimensional system. We need to take the derivative of vector-valued function $\vc{f}(x,y)=(f(x,y),g(x,y))$ at the equilibrium. In this case, the derivative is the matrix of partial derivatives, or Jacobian matrix, of $\vc{f}$, which is $$D_{\vc{f}}(x,y) = \begin{bmatrix}\pdiff{f}{x}(x,y) & \pdiff{f}{y}(x,y)\\ \pdiff{g}{x}(x,y) & \pdiff{g}{y}(x,y) \end{bmatrix}.$$ If we let $A = D_{\vc{f}}(x_e,y_e)$ then, when we zoom in on the equilibrium $(x_e,y_e)$, the original system becomes indistinguishable from the linear system $\diff{\vc{x} }{t} =A\vc{x}$, with the understanding that the origin of the linear system corresponds to the equilibrium $(x_e,y_e)$ (as we shift our view to center the equilibrium as we zoom in). The stability of the equilibrium $(x_e,y_e)$ depends on the eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ of the
    of $\vc{f}$ evaluated at $(x,y)=$
    . The equilibrium $(x_e,y_e)$ is stable if
    . Moreover, the classification of the equilibrium (as a stable node, unstable, saddle, stable spiral or unstable spiral) is determined from these eigenvalues just like for the linear system (with the exception of the center, but we won't worry about that here).

  2. Let's continue with the example from the phase plane analysis introduction: \begin{align*} \diff{x}{t} &= - 2 x + 3 y\\ \diff{y}{t} &= 4 x - y^{2}. \end{align*} On the below phase plane sketch, the nullclines and the equilibria. (You can copy your result from the phase plane analysis introduction.)
    1. You should have found that the system has two equilibria. Let the first equilibrium be the one closest to the origin. List the equilibria: equilibrium 1:
      , equilibrium 2:

      Our goal is to characterize each equilibrium. We need to linearize the system of equations around each equilibrium to obtain an equation of the form $\diff{\vc{x}}{t}=A\vc{x}$, where $A$ is the Jacobian matrix evaluated at the equilibrium. That equation will be capture the dynamics of the full system when we zoom in on that equilibrium (and view that equilibrium as being the origin). In particular, we will be able to determine what happens to initial conditions that are really close to the equilibrium.

      First, we need to write down the vector-valued function $\vc{f}(x,y)$ that is the right hand side of the above system of equations. If we let $\vc{x}=(x,y)$, then the system of equations will be $\diff{ \vc{x} }{t} = \vc{f}(\vc{x})$. This function $\vc{f}$ is:



      $\displaystyle \vc{f}(x,y)= $



      Next, calculate the Jacobian matrix (or matrix of partial derivatives) of $\vc{f}$. At this point, calculate it at an arbitrary point $(x,y)$.



      $D_{\vc{f}}(x,y) = $





      Notice how all entries of the Jacobian are numbers, except for the lower right entry. That's because this system is already nearly linear. The only nonlinearity is the $- y^{2}$ in the second equation, which leads to the expression $_$ in the lower right of the Jacobian. If the system had been completely linear, then the Jacobian matrix would be the same thing as the matrix $A$ used to represent the linear system.

    2. Let's characterize the first equilibrium: $(x_e,y_e) = _$. Near this equilibrium, the system can be approximated by $\diff{ \vc{x} }{t} = A\vc{x}$ where $A$ is the Jacobian evaluated at the equilibrium, i.e.,


      $A=D_{\vc{f}}($
      ,
      $) = $





      What are the eigenvalues of $A$? $\lambda_1 = $
      , $\lambda_2=$
      (Enter in increasing order.)

      Is the equilibrium $_$ stable or unstable?
      . Classify the equilibruim. It is a/an
      .

      Calculate the eigenvectors of $A$. $\vc{u}_1=$
      , $\vc{u}_2=$

      Sketch the eigenvectors on the above phase plane coming out of the equilibrium $_$. For each eigenvector, draw two arrows, on opposites sides of the equilibrium. If the eigenvalue is positive, draw the arrows coming out of the equilibrium. If the eigenvalue is negative, draw the arrows coming toward the equilibrium. In this case, only one of the four arrows will be in the first quadrant and directly relevant. (We drew only the first quadrant as we're imagining $x$ and $y$ are positive or zero.) But, for completeness, draw all four arrows. Draw the arrows fairly short, as they guide the behavior of the solution only close to the equilibrium, which is where the linear approximation is valid.

    3. Next, characterize the second equilibrium: $(x_e,y_e) = _$. Near this equilibrium, the system can be approximated by $\diff{ \vc{x} }{t} = A\vc{x}$ where $A$ is the Jacobian evaluated at the equilibrium, i.e.,


      $A=D_{\vc{f}}($
      ,
      $) = $





      What are the eigenvalues of $A$? $\lambda_1 = $
      , $\lambda_2=$
      (Enter in increasing order.)

      Is the equilibrium $_$ stable or unstable?
      . Classify the equilibruim. It is a/an
      .

      Calculate the eigenvectors of $A$. $\vc{u}_1=$
      , $\vc{u}_2=$

      If we think of the linear system around $_$, the solution should approach the equilibrium from which direction?
      (This is true because the component along the eigenvector
      decays much faster.) Draw arrows showing from which direction the solution should approach the equilibrium. These arrows should point toward the equilibrium and come from opposite directions. Draw the arrows fairly short, as they guide the behavior of the solution only close to the equilibrium, which is where the linear approximation is valid.

    4. Draw a trajectory starting from the arrow you drew coming out of the first equilibrium and ending up at the second equilibrium (approaching the second equilibrium from the direction of the arrow you drew). This trajectory should obey the direction arrows you determined in the phase plane analysis introduction.

      Draw solution trajectories starting from the initial conditions $(8,1)$, $(4,0)$, and $(0,6)$. Each solution trajectory should follow the direction arrows you determined in the phase plane analysis introduction and should join up with the first trajectory you drew. (These trajectories don't actually merge with the first trajectory but they come very close. You can just draw them as merging together.)


      Since the graphs must be graded by hand, you can achieve at most 70% correct via computer grading.

  3. Here's another example from the the phase plane analysis introduction: \begin{align*} \diff{u}{t} &= -u(v-2)\\ \diff{v}{t} &= v(3-u). \end{align*} There you already determined the nullclines and the equilibria.

    Calculate the Jacobian of the system. Evaluate the Jacobian at each equilibrium and classify each equilibrium. If an equilibrium is a saddle, draw arrows toward the equilibrium in the direction of the eigenvector with the negative eigenvalue and arrows away from the equilibrium in the direction of the eigenvector with the positive eigenvalue.

  4. Consider the dynamical system \begin{align*} \diff{x}{t} &= -x^2+y+1\\ \diff{y}{t} &= -x-y+1\\ x(0) &=0\\ y(0) &=0 \end{align*} Determine the nullclines and equilibria and draw them on a phase plane. Classify each equilibrium. In each region of the phase plane, sketch a direction arrow indicating the approximate direction that a trajectory must move in that region.

    Sketch a plausible solution on the phase plane that is consistent with the direction arrows and the equilibrium classification. Also sketch your solution as $x$ and $y$ plotted versus time.